U.S. Department of Labor


 
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Pittsburgh Safety & Health Technology Center
P.O. Box 18233
Pittsburgh, PA 15236



 



Mine Waste and Geotechnical Engineering Division

December 13, 1999

MEMORANDUM FOR  LEE D. RATLIFF
                                  Assistant District Manager, North Central District
                                  Metal and NonMetal Mine Safety and Health

THROUGH:                 EDWARD J. MILLER
                                  Chief, Pittsburgh Safety and Health Technology
                                  Center

                                 KELVIN K. WU 
                                 Chief, Mine Waste and Geotechnical Engineering
                                 Division  

                                 DONALD T. KIRKWOOD
                                 Supervisory Civil Engineer, Mine Waste and
                                 Geotechnical Engineering Division

FROM:                      TERENCE M. TAYLOR
                                 Civil Engineer, Mine Waste and Geotechnical
                                 Engineering Division

                                 GHARIB IBRAHIM 
                                 Civil Engineer, Mine Waste and Geotechnical
                                 Engineering Division

SUBJECT:                 Executive Summary, Relief Valve Testing for 
                                 Explosion Investigation at Kaiser Aluminum and
                                 Chemical Corporation's Gramercy Plant, MSHA
                                  I.D. No. 16-00352

On October 7, 1999, and November 16, 1999, relief valves from Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation's (Kaiser) Gramercy Plant were examined and tested at Valve Actuation and Repair Company's (VARCO) facility in Monessen, Pennsylvania. VARCO is a licensed VR (Valve Repair) shop in accordance with the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors. Testing was witnessed by the Director of the Pressure Relief Department of The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors. Representatives from Kaiser, the United Steelworkers of America, and the Plaintiffs were present for the testing. Four of the seven relief valves from the manifolds protecting Digestion Area Flash Tanks 7, 8, and 9 were taken as evidence for evaluation. These tanks were three of the five sealed vessels which were involved in the explosion on July 5, 1999. The four valves were 8xlO's manufactured by Farris-Teledyne. Two 39 2 were assembled by Farris-Teledyne and two by Groth Corporation. Each valve was given a unique identifier. The valves were labeled MSHARV1039, MSHARVU1, MSHARVU2, and MSHARVU3. The first two were stamped for air service, and the later two for steam service. The valves had identifying plates with stamped set pressures ranging from 47 to 49 pounds per square inch.

The testing on October 7, 1999, entailed a pretest inspection, and placement of the valves on the test media stand. The valves rated for air service were placed on the air stand, and the valves rated for steam service were placed on the steam stand. The valves were tested in their as-found condition with the exception of removing some loose scale in the inlets and outlets. On November 16, 1999, the valves were disassembled and an internal inspection was conducted.

The following is a summary of the test results and conditions observed for each of the four valves:

CONCLUSIONS

The observed conditions of valves MSHARVU1 and MSHARV1039 were evidence that the valves had leaked while in service, and therefore may have been blocked out prior to the explosion. The product build up in these valve would have adversely affected their set pressure.

The set pressure for relief valve MSHARVU2 was consistent with the value indicated on its nameplate.

The set pressure for valve MSHARVU3 was undetermined. The flow capacity of this valve would have been reduced by 58% by the large amount of hardened product scale on the inlet nozzle orifice.

The springs in each of the valves were within specification for the pressures stamped on the name plates.

Based on the condition on valves MSHARVU1, MSHARVU2, and MSHARV1039, it appeared that they were not being maintained in good repair.

Attachment

cc:
E. Teaster
M. Skiles
S. Michalek
Files