Record Number: 2493
CIS Descriptors: BURNS
WELDING AND CUTTING
EXPLOSIONS
VEHICLE REPAIR AND SERVICING
FUEL TANKS
CONTAMINATION
TANK TRUCKS

FATALITY REPORT



REPORT CHARACTERISTICS:

DONOR: Office of the Chief Coroner
JURISDICTION: Ontario
REPORT TITLE: Verdict of Coroner's Jury
INDIVIDUAL PRESIDING: Dr. K. Flynn, Coroner
PLACE OF INQUIRY: Mississauga
DATE OF INQUIRY : 1992-02-20

INFORMATION ABOUT DECEASED:

NAME: Roger Wilder
OCCUPATION: Class A mechanic
INDUSTRIAL SECTOR: Vehicle repair industry

ACCIDENT INFORMATION:

DATE OF ACCIDENT : 1991-06-26
PLACE OF ACCIDENT: Balzan Truck Centre, 13059 Airport Road
BRIEF CAUSE OF DEATH: Fourth degree burns to the entire body.
BRIEF MANNER OF DEATH: In the process of welding, an explosion occurred
spewing the contents of the tank towards the back of the truck and
completely engulfing both men in flames.

INFORMATION ABOUT DECEASED:

NAME: Charles Huber
OCCUPATION: Apprentice automotive mechanic
INDUSTRIAL SECTOR: Vehicle repair industry

ACCIDENT INFORMATION:

DATE OF FATALITY : 1991-06-28
PLACE OF FATALITY: Toronto Wellesley Hospital, Burn Unit
BRIEF CAUSE OF DEATH: Ninety percent burns over body complicated by
smoke inhalation and acute respiratory failure.
BRIEF MANNER OF DEATH: In the process of welding, an explosion occurred
spewing the contents of the tank towards the back of the truck and
completely engulfing both men in flames.
ACCIDENT DESCRIPTION:
Charles Huber, aged 28, an Apprentice Automotive Mechanic, and Roger
Wilder, age 32, a Class A Mechanic, were assigned to the task of
repairing a white, 150 gallon tank located in the box of a pickup truck
(1985 GMC model) owned by Beth Neil Farms. The repair was being
conducted at the Balzan Truck and Mechanical Repair Centre, 13059
Airport Road, Caledon, Ontario. The tank, originally used as a
pesticide container, was then being used by Beth Neil Farms to refuel
their farming equipment with dyed diesel. The tank had a hairline crack
(two inches) on the upper right rear corner. They were told the tank
had been pumped and had contained diesel. A quantity of diesel fuel had
remained in the tank that was later found to be contaminated with
gasoline. We believe the following sequence of events took place: set
up equipment; removed tank filler cap; looked inside and sniffed the
contents; the crack was cleaned with a grinder; a short blast of CO2
from a portable fire extinguisher was shot into the fill hole; the
ground clamp for the MIG welder was attached to the fill hole; proceeded
to weld the crack.

RECOMMENDATIONS ISSUING FROM INQUIRY:

Education and training

1. All fuel tank repairs should be done in shops fully equipped for the
job.

2. Circulation of bulletins by the Ministry of Labour and Fuel Safety
Branch concerning potential hazards of welding fuel tanks, to all
garages, repair facilities and welding shops in the province of Ontario.

3. Federal and provincial Transportation of Dangerous Goods Acts set a
standard training program for drivers, as well as certification program
for drivers transporting dangerous goods specific to the requirements of
each section of the industry. Such training should be conducted by an
accredited
instructor.

4. Endorsement certification program for welding of fuel tanks be
instituted.

Recommendations to bulk plant

5. Bulk plant operators be responsible for orientation of new fuel delivery
drivers.

6. All bulk plants to have correct charts and detailed map on site.

7. Reconciliation of dip figures within 48 hours of delivery and all
discrepancies be reported to fuel supplier forthwith.

8. Testing devices be made available to operators of bulk plants.

9. Better labelling of tanks to specify product, capacity, interior
dimensions and standard or non standard tank.

10. Colour coding of pumps and pipes at the depots should be consistent and
mandatory.

Recommendations for fuel tankers

11. Tankers be inspected yearly or at 90000 kilometers, whichever comes
first, and at each change of ownership. Inspection should include
examination and testing of all manifold components.

12. All tankers carrying unleaded fuels be inspected for BUNA-N disks and be
replaced by VITON.

13. Manufacturers of fuel trucks, manifolds and valves update their parts
listings, manuals, etc. to indicate that VITON discs be used on all fuel
trucks.

Legislative changes

14. Increase penalty for failure to comply with Section 16(6) of the
Coroners Act.

15. Amend the Occupational Health and Safety Act, Regulation 692, Section
82(1)(b) as applied to repairs on containers, by including the word
"combustible" as per Ministry of Labour hazard alert.

16. Gasoline Handling Act be amended to prohibit simultaneous offloading of
incompatible fuels through a manifold.

17. Reconciliation of opening and closing dip measurements to be done by
driver on site following delivery of fuel. Discrepancies should be
reported to both fuel carrier and customer. These changes of procedures
should be reflected in the Gasoline Handling Act.

18. Require all fuel suppliers and all fuel carriers to render a written
report to the Fuel Safety Branch within 24 hours all incidents involving
any suspected or actual fuel contamination or loss of products, however
caused, providing at a minimum the following details:

a) date, time and location of the incident

b) type and amount of fuel involved

c) nature and circumstance of the incident

d) name and address of the owner of the facility and carrier as
applicable

e) name and address of all witnesses to the incident

f) steps taken to remedy the contamination or investigate the incident

g) steps taken or to be taken to dispose of the contaminated fuel

h) steps to be taken to prevent a recurrence.

COMMENTS ON RECOMMENDATIONS BY CORONER:

The contamination of dyed diesel with gasoline occurred during the night of
June 11, 1991 during the delivery at the UCO (United Co-op) Georgetown Bulk
Depot. This resulted in dyed diesel tank #5, capacity 22700 litres, being
contaminated with approximately 2000 litres of gasoline. This contamination
went undetected by anyone for over two weeks and consequently was delivered
to many UCO customers; one of them was Beth Neil Farms.

Factors which may have contributed to the fuel contamination are as follows:

a) the delivery truck driver was unfamiliar with the bulk fuel depot in
Georgetown

b) the method of double offloading of incompatible fuels was used

c) gas may have been drawn across the defective splitter valve by the
continuous running of the diesel pump after the diesel compartment on
the tanker had emptied

d) a damaged splitter valve disc was found on the tanker two months after
the tragedy

e) damaged splitter valve disc was found to be a BUNA-N type which is known
to deteriorate when in contact with no lead gas

f) reconciliation of dip measurements was not performed by the driver or
the delivery fuel company; the bulk depot owners had a reconciliation
process in place, but never acted on discrepancies

g) possible fatigue from long hours of work by the delivery truck driver.

1. It was clear from the evidence that while the practice of welding is a
skill gained by a combination of training and experience, the special
risks associated with welding fuel tanks require additional training and
testing equipment. Various testing devices are available which test for
the presence of combustible or explosive substances in containers and a
protocol is recommended for tank repairs.

The protocol generally calls for testing the contents, draining,
cleaning or otherwise rendering free of hazardous substances (such as by
purging with an inert gas or substance) and retesting prior to welding.
When using carbon dioxide for purging, it should be supplied by
continuous flow from a CO2 cylinder (not a portable fire extinguisher)
and introduced into the tank through a hose extending to near the bottom
of the tank with all tank openings closed except the fill and vent
openings. Low pressure CO2 should be used to prevent static electricity
throughout the welding operation. The tank in question did not meet
specifications of the federal Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act,
Section 2.31 which deals with labelling and fastening, Section 5.39(1)
which deals with marking of leaking tanks or Section 5.41 which requires
the manufacturer's identification.

2. See recommendation #1.

3. Federal and provincial Transportation of Dangerous Goods Acts currently
do not have a standard training and testing program for drivers and the
scope of existing programs ranges from a brief orientation, showing of a
video of the Mississauga train derailment, to intensive in house
training. The larger companies in the petroleum industry usually have
full time instructors.

Certification at present can be by another driver who might or might not
be a certified instructor. There is no minimum training period and no
requirement for testing of drivers of dangerous goods.

4. See recommendation #1.

5. The driver in this case was new to the site and was provided only with a
rough map of the plant. There was some difficulty with offloading
gasoline on June 11 as one pipeline valve was not fully closed and
another not fully open, thus allowing gasoline to recirculate within the
pipeline instead of going into the bulk tank.

6. A non standard tank was not identified as such, and required use of a
special conversion chart from centimeters by dipstick to litres.
Although this was not a direct contributing factor to the accident, it
was evidence of inaccurate auditing procedures by the bulk plant
operator and the fuel carrier.

7. Discrepancies occurred between amounts of gasoline and dyed diesel
delivered and received. This went undetected for about two weeks.
During this time, the contaminated fuel was distributed to customers.

8. After the mix up was discovered, the delivery fuel truck driver required
from his employer that a testing device be made available to him. He
wanted to confirm that the fuel he was delivering to customers was not
contaminated. Up to the inquest closing, the bulk plant operator was
still considering the request.

9. See recommendation #6.

10. Pumps and pipes generally conform to a standard colour system. The
premium and regular gasoline pipes at this plant had reversed colours,
but this did not contribute to the contamination.

11. The tanker in this case was purchased from a previous owner in 1987.
The manifold valves were not included in regular inspections. It was
stated by the maker of the manifold system that since unleaded gasoline
can cause rapid deterioration of the BUNA-N material used in the valve
gaskets and "O" rings, they were supplying VITON which resists
deterioration by unleaded gas. However, recent written specifications
and the service manual continued to list BUNA-N parts. It could not be
confirmed if the gaskets removed by the mechanic in September 1991 were
of BUNA-N, but they were replaced by VITON.

12. See recommendation #11.

13. See recommendation #11.

14. The investigation was hampered by failure to provide relevant and vital
information to the investigator, who was acting on behalf of the
Coroner. The owner of the tanker and the driver knew that the Coroner's
investigation into the deaths of two men was ongoing, and had been
interviewed earlier. They knew that the tanker was a key factor in the
contamination which led to the deaths, and were aware in September 1991
of the discovery of a damaged manifold splitter valve gasket in the
tanker. The damaged gasket was put aside by the mechanic. The owner
and the driver saw it and knew it was available. It was missing when
the investigator was made aware of it on January 27, 1992 one week
before the inquest opened. Had the valve gasket been saved, it is
likely that tests could have been ordered to determine if it could have
allowed gasoline to cross over to the diesel tank. Only photographs and
negatives taken of the gasket by the mechanic were made available.

The initial investigation also was impaired temporarily when the bulk
plant owners, on the advice of their solicitor, were reluctant to
provide access to the delivery truck and records. The Coroner invoked
the requirements of the Act successfully.

The jury feels that the penalty for failure to comply with Section 16(6)
should be increased to a level which would emphasize the duty to provide
information.

15. Section 82(2)(b) Occupational Health and Safety Act, Regulation 692
states that before performing hot work on vessels, they must "be drained
and cleaned or otherwise rendered free from any explosive, flammable or
harmful substance". Since diesel fuel is combustible, the Ministry of
Labour recommended that this word be added. It was suggested that this
regulation be posted in every automotive mechanic workplace.

16. This is probably the most important recommendation from the jury. Since
it has been shown that double offloading of incompatible fuels can occur
when a manifold splitter is used, it has been suggested that fuel
tankers carrying gasoline and diesel at the same time should not be
equipped with manifolds. Less than 2% gasoline in diesel creates an
explosive mixture. Mixing can occur by a number of circumstances:
driver error, mechanical error, deliberate dilution, vandalism. Risk of
driver error and mechanical error at offloading can be markedly reduced
by eliminating manifold use.

17. As referred to in "By what means", reconciliation of opening and closing
dipstick measurements of the bulk storage tanks, at the time of
offloading gasoline and diesel on June 11, should have revealed the
possibility of discrepancies and alerted the carrier and/or the bulk
plant operator to the possibility of contamination.

18. Public safety requires a system of monitoring suppliers, carriers, and
bulk storage owners for contamination or loss of fuel which could
endanger the public. The inquest heard of incidents of major fuel
thefts, contaminations corrected and not reported, and the practice of
diluting contaminated fuel to raise the flash point. Since large fuel
thefts have been reported from unattended bulk storage plants, the
possibility exists of unauthorized mixing of incompatible fuels or
hazardous waste. Reports of theft and vandalism at a number of bulk
plants belonging to the same owner, were presented in evidence and there
appears to be a problem of security which should be addressed.