|  |  | 
 
 
 
           
            |  
                
                  
                
 REPORT CHARACTERISTICS:
 
 DONOR: Office of the Chief Coroner
 JURISDICTION: Ontario
 REPORT TITLE: Verdict of Coroner's Jury
 INDIVIDUAL PRESIDING: Dr. R. D. MacKinlay, Coroner
 PLACE OF INQUIRY: Sarnia
 DATE OF INQUIRY : 1984-07-16
 
 INFORMATION ABOUT DECEASED:
 
 NAME: John Douglas McLean
 OCCUPATION: Maintenance
 INDUSTRIAL SECTOR: Petrochemical
 NAME: Kenneth James George
 OCCUPATION: Maintenance
 INDUSTRIAL SECTOR: Petrochemical
 
 ACCIDENT INFORMATION:
 
 DATE OF ACCIDENT : 1984-04-20
 PLACE OF ACCIDENT: Polysar Ltd., Vidal Street, Sarnia
 BRIEF CAUSE OF DEATH: Multiple injuries to lungs and other areas 
                  of both
 bodies.
 BRIEF MANNER OF DEATH: Due to explosion of hydrogen cloud that 
                  caused shock
 wave injuries.
 ACCIDENT DESCRIPTION:
 These two employees of Polysar Corporation were engaged in the 
                  start-up
 of the Litol Unit after it had been shutdown for its six month
 maintenance inspection. During the start-up, hydrogen gas was 
                  gradually
 built up to over 600 pounds per square inch in the system when 
                  the
 gasket sealing on an eighteen inch manway cover blew out allowed 
                  several
 kilograms of hydrogen to escape which resulted in an explosion, 
                  killing
 the two men and causing extensive damage.
 
 
 RECOMMENDATIONS ISSUING FROM INQUIRY:
 
 1. (a) That all durable type gasket material be tagged indicating 
                  the date
 received from the manufacturer and the gaskets themselves be 
                  tagged
 indicating date received.
 
 (b) Quality control procedures should be made on all gaskets 
                  prior to
 use.
 
 (c) In the petrochemical industry, bolt to bolt type gaskets 
                  be adopted
 as standard.
 
 (d) That a manual be prepared that will be accessible to all
 maintenance personnel outlining the correct gasket for a particular
 flange.
 
 (e) A written record be maintained when changes in type of gasket(s)
 takes place with a reason for the change stipulated and with 
                  the name of
 the person who authorized the change.
 
 2. That standard procedures for tightening flanges on high pressure 
                  lines
 and lines carrying toxic substances should be:
 
 (a) testing of torque,
 
 (b) in line air pressure gauges,
 
 (c) regular maintenance on a time frequency basis.
 
 3. Flange designs, incorporating radial restraint and capable 
                  of retaining
 gasket fragments under leakage conditions should be adopted 
                  as this
 would minimize the effects of gasket failure.
 
 4. For start-ups, a standard operating procedure should be used 
                  throughout
 the petrochemical industry.
 
 (a) Any deviation from this procedure as laid down by a manual 
                  must
 have written approval by the on-site foreman.
 
 (b) Initiate a complete check-off list to ensure that all turn 
                  around
 maintenance work is completed and that the unit is ready for 
                  service
 before starting up.
 
 (c) Radio communication is necessary at all times and especially 
                  during
 start-up and shutdown.
 
 5. The rationale for enclosing high pressure compressors, especially 
                  in
 areas of highly volatile gases, should be reviewed with the 
                  intent of
 removing the enclosure.
 
 6. The location of control rooms should be reviewed so that 
                  the buildings
 and contents will not be seriously affected due to operative 
                  unit
 explosions.
 
 7. Standard operating procedures should be updated each time 
                  that changes
 are made in the system and whenever there is equipment changes 
                  to ensure
 that these changes have been communicated to all personnel involved.
 
 8. Shut-off valves should be in place between one piece of equipment 
                  and
 another and located in such a way that no flanged connection 
                  should
 intervene between the shut-off valves and the equipment which 
                  is the
 potential source of leakage.
 
 COMMENTS ON RECOMMENDATIONS BY CORONER:
 
 1. (a) The jury were told that the type of gasket used, deteriorated 
                  over
 a period of time.
 
 (b) Self-explanatory.
 
 (c) The jury learned that the type of gasket used was not always
 centred properly and were told that if the gasket was bolt to 
                  bolt, it
 would eliminate the problem.
 
 (d) Self-explanatory.
 
 (e) Self-explanatory.
 
 2. The jury learned that the manway cover may not have been 
                  tightened
 sufficiently because pneumatic wrenches were used to tighten 
                  the bolts
 on the manway cover.
 
 3. The jury learned that the flanges on the manway opening were 
                  flat with
 no inset for the gasket.
 
 4. The jury learned that the operators during start-up follow 
                  a routine
 they had developed from experience and nothing was specifically 
                  written
 for a checklist.
 
 5. The jury learned that the Litol Unit was enclosed on two 
                  sides and a
 roof and this increased the concentration of the hydrogen gas 
                  and
 increased the force of the explosion.
 
 6. The control room for the Litol Unit was badly damaged by 
                  the explosion
 because it was not protected by an earthen barrier or some other
 protection.
 
 7. Self-explanatory.
 
 8. The jury learned that a flange damaged by the explosion leaked 
                  a
 volatile liquid for seven hours because there was not a shut-off 
                  vlave
 between the flange and the supply.
 
 
 
 
 
  
               |  
 
 |  |