Record Number: 1945

FATALITY REPORT



REPORT CHARACTERISTICS:

DONOR: Office of the Chief Coroner
JURISDICTION: Ontario
REPORT TITLE: Verdict of Coroner's Jury
INDIVIDUAL PRESIDING: Dr. John Strathearn, Coroner
PLACE OF INQUIRY: Oakville
DATE OF INQUIRY : 1987-09-10

INFORMATION ABOUT DECEASED:

NAME: Martin Baikie
OCCUPATION: Maintenance
INDUSTRIAL SECTOR: Petroleum, Chemical

ACCIDENT INFORMATION:

DATE OF ACCIDENT : 1987-04-03
PLACE OF ACCIDENT: Petro Canada Refinery - Oakville
BRIEF CAUSE OF DEATH: Extensive third degree burns.
BRIEF MANNER OF DEATH: While completing removal of 14 inch pipe-hydro
carbon material was released from an 8 inch connecting pipe. A flash
fire ensued, source of ignition unknown. Mr. Baikie died as a result of
this fire.
ACCIDENT DESCRIPTION:
The No. 1 Catalytic Cracker Unit at Petro Canada Refinery, Oakville, was
undergoing a routine general maintenance procedure referred to as a
"turnaround". The turnaround involves preparation by Petro Canada
employees followed by the issuance of work permits for specific jobs
which are then performed by Catalytic Maintenance Inc. who are under
contract to Petro Canada.


RECOMMENDATIONS ISSUING FROM INQUIRY:

1. All pipes that are not used in the normal course of operations should be
blanked at both ends.

2. (1) When a cold work permit is issued in a turnaround with instructions
to "blank per list", no other work is authorized other than the work
described in the approved blank list. Deviations from published blank
lists must be approved by either the area process supervisor or
operations engineer.

(2) The term "General Maintenance" and other vague instructions should
not be permitted. Permits must be more specific and restricted to a
specific area.

(3) In order to control the two hour validity limit - permit should be
surrendered and signed.

(4) No permit should be issued by operations or received by performing
authority unless absolutely complete.

(5) When promoting an employee to the rank of "signing authority",
management must assure themselves that the person invovled has adequate
experience, job knowledge and can comprehend all written instructions.

(6) All rules regarding permits as outlined in the standing
instructions should be followed - See exhibit 24.

3. All employees working at Petro Canada's Trafalgar refinery must have
access to and be familiar with the standing instructions.

4. A blank list should have a schematic diagram, showing the position of
every blank covered in the list. This list and schematic should be
updated at the end of every turnaround.

5. (1) Petro Canada's Safety Checklist shall be given to all contractors'
and sub-contractors' personnel to ensure their full understanding of the
refinery's safety regulations and permit systems.

(2) Catalytic maintenance should have representation at all Petro
Canada safety meetings.

6. All interconnecting lines between operating and turnaround units must be
depressured, blanked and gas freed. This activity must be completed
prior to release to maintenance.

7. Where work overlaps two shifts, the operating authority should review
the work done and discuss the status with the incoming shift.

8. Post shutdown meeting between all co-ordinators and supervisors to
evaluate shutdown and recommend improvements in work and safety
procedures.

COMMENTS ON RECOMMENDATIONS BY CORONER:

Evidence indicated that everyone at Petro Canada felt that the 8 inch
connecting pipe had been cleansed of any petroleum product, and in fact
had not been used for over a year. The accident would not have occurred
had this 8 inch pipe been capped or sealed at both ends. This led to
Recommendation No. 1.

The permits issued for the specific job involved in this inquest, proved
to be improper in several ways:

a) the pipes which were to be blanked in this operation are contained in a
"blank list". The 8 inch pipe was not included in this list. This led
to Recommendation No. 2(1).

b) a permit was issued indicating "General Maintenance", and was thought to
be too vague. This led to Recommendation No. 2(2).

c) The removal of the pipe involved was delayed from the evening shift to
the night shift because a crane was not available, and a new permit
should have been issued to the nightshift. This led to Recommendation
No. 2(3).

d) One of the permits presented in evidence was incomplete in that it had
not had appropriate checkmarks inserted indicating that the involved
pipes were clear of petroleum products. This led to Recommendation No.
2(4).

e) Evidence from one of the witnesses, indicated that the permit had not
been completely read or apparently understood by him, leading to
Recommendation No. 2(5).

f) Rules indicated in Petro Canada's Standing Instructions had not been
followed, which led to Recommendation No. 2(6).

Evidence from some witnesses indicated they were not familiar with the
standing instructions, leading to Recommendation No. 3.

The crucial disconnection of the 8 inch pipe was made below a valve
because this connection was more accessible. Had the connection been
made above or beyond the valve, the petroleum product might not have
escaped. It was felt that a schematic diagram in addition to the
printed "blank list" would be desirable, leading to Recommendation No. 4.

Petro Canada's safety checklist was apparently not followed or known to
some of the contractors' employees, leading to Recommendation No. 5(1).

Catalytic maintenance people were not apparently represented at all
meetings, or completely familiar with many safety procedures at Petro
Canada or in attendance at these meetings on a regular basis leading to
Recommendation No. 5(2).

Recommendation No. 6 refers to the same 8 inch interconnecting pipe
which was not in use and is similar to Recommendation No. 1.

As in Recommendation No. 2(3), this particular job extended into two
shifts and, in addition to a new permit, adequate verbal communication
should also have occurred, leading to Recommendation No. 7. Evidence
suggested that this accident might have been prevented by a meeting to
discuss what had taken place in the turnaround, leading to
Recommendation No. 8.






©2004 Canadian  Centre  for  Occupational  Health  &  Safety  
http://www.ccohs.ca/  E-mail: clientservices@ccohs.ca  Fax: (905) 572-2206  Phone: (905) 572-2981  
Mail:  135  Hunter  Street  East,  Hamilton  Ontario  L8N  1M5